Objective
To evaluate and rank the comparative clinical efficacy of targeted therapeutics in prostate cancer using a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) framework
Methods
- Conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) and feasibility assessments to ensure the validity of indirect comparisons
- Constructed a connected evidence network and implemented a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) in R (gemtc)
- Assessed between-study heterogeneity (I², DIC), model convergence (Gelman–Rubin diagnostics), and performed extensive sensitivity analyses
- Estimated treatment effects on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), generating SUCRA-based rankings for all comparators
Outcome
Delivered decision-grade comparative efficacy inputs to support cost-effectiveness modelling and strengthen the payer value proposition for access submissions
Mauris non dignissim purus, ac commodo diam. Donec sit amet lacinia nulla. Aliquam quis purus in justo pulvinar tempor. Aliquam tellus nulla, sollicitudin at euismod.
Mauris non dignissim purus, ac commodo diam. Donec sit amet lacinia nulla. Aliquam quis purus in justo pulvinar tempor. Aliquam tellus nulla, sollicitudin at euismod